Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$DFLAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- sticx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Corporate Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fdbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Bond Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cpuax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AAM/Insight Select Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dsicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Diamond Hill Corporate Credit Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- shyox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Global High Yield Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nstix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Short Term Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nmhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Northern Multi-Manager High Yield Opportunity Fund
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- smrsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »