Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$DEEF Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- gscox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Insights Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mseix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
AMG Managers Special Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mrkax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AB All Market Income Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mcmyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
AMG Managers Cadence Mid Cap Fund - Class I
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mcvcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opportunities C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mxfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ncinx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nicholas High Income Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nbmix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- aaapx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »