Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$DEECX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- clmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Mortgage Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nshax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ihyax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- riocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Income Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jincx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Unconstrained Debt Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ncoax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Symphony High Yield Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- souax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Beacon Sound Point Floating Rate Income Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ifrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rsflx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »