• asuax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

AllianzGI Global Sustainability Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• ihssx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Growth

The Hartford Small Company Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• fsrfx
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Industrials

Fidelity® Select Transportation Portfolio

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

• tdfax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Value

Transamerica Dividend Focused Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• crmmx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Blend

CRM Mid Cap Value Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• glo
• Mutual Fund
• Other
• Tactical Allocation

Clough Global Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 4.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Tactical Allocation Other fund. See why »

• lfmax
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Future

LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

• pvqax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• mnrix
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Real Estate

Manning & Napier Real Estate Series Class I

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

• prrfx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2055 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• edd
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund

Expenses: 3.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• amfex
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

AAMA Equity Fund

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• prphx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• cut
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Basic Materials

Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

• ardc
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.

Expenses: 3.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• gilfx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund C-Class

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• lbwax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Value

BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• snoax
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• jpc
• Mutual Fund
• Other
• Preferred Stock

Nuveen Preferred & Income Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 3.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Preferred Stock Other fund. See why »

• eicgx
• Mutual Fund
• International Stocks
• China Stock

Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »