Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$DBRIX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tsvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fsutx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Utilities
Fidelity® Select Utilities Portfolio
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »
- twbix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Century Balanced Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- devcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Delaware Small Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dfe
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Europe Stock
WisdomTree Europe SmallCap Dividend Fund
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- dgcax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Corporate Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dhhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Diamond Hill High Yield Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- usglx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dmre
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
DeltaShares S&P EM 100 & Managed Risk ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- dregx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- dwmf
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- ecldx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Eaton Vance Short Duration Government Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- edow
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- eginx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Europe Stock
Invesco European Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- eiamx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- eifhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wfddx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Wells Fargo Discovery Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- emgax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »