Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$DAGVX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- eilvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- vsmv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- msdvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Service Shares
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- chdvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Cullen High Dividend Equity Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fdrr
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fmstx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Federated MDT Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lsvvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dcuix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
DWS CROCI U.S. Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- higjx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »