Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$DAFRX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- masbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay Unconstrained Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hahrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford High Yield Fund Class R3
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- csoax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Credit Suisse Strategic Income Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pggix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Global Income Trust Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dpfnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund Class I
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tmayx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Touchstone Credit Opportunities II Fund Y
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mcwix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BlackRock Strategic Global Bond Fund, Inc. Investor C1 Shares
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- stsbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Short-Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lmyix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global High Yield Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »