Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$CUBCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pelnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class I-3
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nshax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phsax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO High Yield Spectrum Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- riocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Income Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- clmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Mortgage Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tboax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Templeton International Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- xprtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IB
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rsflx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- apecx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia High Yield Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »