Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$CSUIX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation Global Equity funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tscpx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wemax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wmmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- womn
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Impact Shares YWCA Women's Empowerment ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- wpasx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AB Concentrated Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wvalx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Weitz Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ylde
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jertx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Real Estate
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate Fund Class T
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
- jgaux
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
JPMorgan Small Cap Core Fund Class R3
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »