Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$CSUIX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation Global Equity funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- alvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Century Large Company Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- anglx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Angel Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund A Shares
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- nmfax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Nationwide Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ptaex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Putnam Tax Exempt Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nusa
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nwcpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Nationwide Core Plus Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- aslax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- oardx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Invesco Oppenheimer Rising Dividends Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ofvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
O'Shaughnessy Market Leaders Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »