CSSPX : Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. Class I

CSSPX is a Sector Equity Market Real Estate with LOW fees.

CSSPX

Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. Class I

FI Score

52 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,678 Sector Equity Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CSSPX vs NOUGX

42% FI Score
  • nougx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Northern U.S. Government Fund

Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs NRICX

42% FI Score
  • nricx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Real Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs OAACX

42% FI Score
  • oaacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Inveso Active Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs JSOCX

42% FI Score
  • jsocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs URE

42% FI Score
  • ure
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra Real Estate

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs UEMPX

42% FI Score
  • uempx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs PACAX

42% FI Score
  • pacax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs OSICX

42% FI Score
  • osicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs OUSM

42% FI Score
  • ousm
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs LCGNX

42% FI Score
  • lcgnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs VARIX

42% FI Score
  • varix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Virtus Rampart Sector Trend Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs VIMCX

42% FI Score
  • vimcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs OCRDX

42% FI Score
  • ocrdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Rising Dividends Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs MSCFX

42% FI Score
  • mscfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs NDVCX

42% FI Score
  • ndvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs NDVBX

42% FI Score
  • ndvbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs ODICX

42% FI Score
  • odicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs OEUR

42% FI Score
  • oeur
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

O’Shares Europe Quality Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs MSACX

42% FI Score
  • msacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs MSGFX

42% FI Score
  • msgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo