CSMMX : Invesco Summit Fund Class C

CSMMX is a US Stocks Market Large Growth with HIGH fees.

CSMMX

Invesco Summit Fund Class C

FI Score

40 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,019 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CSMMX vs NLGCX

42% FI Score
  • nlgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Global Strategic Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs HFAAX

42% FI Score
  • hfaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs NOUGX

42% FI Score
  • nougx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Northern U.S. Government Fund

Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs NRICX

42% FI Score
  • nricx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Real Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs OAACX

42% FI Score
  • oaacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Inveso Active Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs JSOCX

42% FI Score
  • jsocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs URE

42% FI Score
  • ure
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra Real Estate

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs UEMPX

42% FI Score
  • uempx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs PACAX

42% FI Score
  • pacax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs OSICX

42% FI Score
  • osicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs OEUR

42% FI Score
  • oeur
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

O’Shares Europe Quality Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs MSACX

42% FI Score
  • msacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs MSGFX

42% FI Score
  • msgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs OLCAX

42% FI Score
  • olcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term California Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs MVGAX

42% FI Score
  • mvgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs OOSNX

42% FI Score
  • oosnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs MWFLX

42% FI Score
  • mwflx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Floating Rate Income Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs ONLN

42% FI Score
  • onln
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

ProShares Online Retail ETF

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs AAAAX

42% FI Score
  • aaaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSMMX vs AGAZX

42% FI Score
  • agazx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

361 Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 2.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo