Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$CPUCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tphix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- prvdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wsicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo Strategic Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- szeax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- frfdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Floating Rate II Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cfrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Floating Rate Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eaiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- flotx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Power Floating Rate Index Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- chydx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »