COWZ : Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF

COWZ is a US Stocks Market Large Value with LOW fees.

COWZ

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF

FI Score

55 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare COWZ vs GER

44% FI Score
  • ger
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

Goldman Sachs MLP and Energy Renaissance Fund

Expenses: 3.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs GMSAX

44% FI Score
  • gmsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs JJC

44% FI Score
  • jjc
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Copper Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs JNSCX

44% FI Score
  • jnscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2025 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs JOEQX

44% FI Score
  • joeqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

JPMorgan Opportunistic Equity Long/Short Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs USWGX

44% FI Score
  • uswgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

USAA World Growth Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs JTA

44% FI Score
  • jta
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Total Return Strategy Fund

Expenses: 2.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs VLAAX

44% FI Score
  • vlaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Value Line Asset Allocation Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs KGGAX

44% FI Score
  • kggax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs MMHCX

44% FI Score
  • mmhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs RMUCX

44% FI Score
  • rmucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester New York Municipals Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs PSHAX

44% FI Score
  • pshax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

PIMCO Short-Term Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs PSI

44% FI Score
  • psi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs PTHAX

44% FI Score
  • pthax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs QIMNX

44% FI Score
  • qimnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

AQR TM International Multi-Style Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs PWLEX

44% FI Score
  • pwlex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs RNDLX

44% FI Score
  • rndlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs MSFLX

44% FI Score
  • msflx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs MVV

44% FI Score
  • mvv
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra MidCap400

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare COWZ vs ANGCX

44% FI Score
  • angcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Angel Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo