Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$CORCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 746 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- dmbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- thndx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Thornburg New Mexico Intermediate Municipal Fund Class D
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lmsbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Federated Municipal Bond Fund Class B Shares
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hmkcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Hartford Municipal Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- robax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Robinson Tax Advantaged Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lmscx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Federated Municipal Bond Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pmoax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Principal Opportunistic Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pcaix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
PGIM California Muni Income Fund-Class B
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gtvax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Madison Tax-Free Virginia Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »