• acsi
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

American Customer Satisfaction ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• tlcyx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Touchstone Large Cap Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• varix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Virtus Rampart Sector Trend Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• ocrdx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Rising Dividends Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• omsox
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Main Street All Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• cmncx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Principal Capital Appreciation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• sect
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Main Sector Rotation ETF

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• xlsr
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

SPDR SSGA U.S. Sector Rotation ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• afdcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

American Century Sustainable Equity Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• jlpcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 2.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »