CIZ : VictoryShares Developed Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF

CIZ is a International Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

CIZ

VictoryShares Developed Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF

FI Score

51 /100

Diversification Rating

6 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CIZ vs BAGAX

48% FI Score
  • bagax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund Advisor Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs BAEIX

48% FI Score
  • baeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs BASFX

48% FI Score
  • basfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BMO Short Tax-Free Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs PARPX

48% FI Score
  • parpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Short Duration Bond Fund Class B

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs LTNYX

48% FI Score
  • ltnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term New York Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs HMJIX

48% FI Score
  • hmjix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Hartford Municipal Short Duration Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs ACSYX

48% FI Score
  • acsyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Invesco Comstock Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs BIAUX

48% FI Score
  • biaux
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs FYC

48% FI Score
  • fyc
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs CPOAX

48% FI Score
  • cpoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Morgan Stanley Insight Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs FFR

48% FI Score
  • ffr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

First Trust FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Markets Real Estate Index Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs FHARX

48% FI Score
  • fharx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2040 Fund

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs FIMSX

48% FI Score
  • fimsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Fidelity® Municipal Income 2025 Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs PSVDX

48% FI Score
  • psvdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

PGIM QMA Small-Cap Value Fund- Class R2

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs GDNA

48% FI Score
  • gdna
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Goldman Sachs Human Evolution ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs TDIV

48% FI Score
  • tdiv
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs EQRR

48% FI Score
  • eqrr
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs COIAX

48% FI Score
  • coiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Conservative Income Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs LZHYX

48% FI Score
  • lzhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CIZ vs MACVX

48% FI Score
  • macvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Conservative Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo