Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$CIHIX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,471 International Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- chclx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
AB Discovery Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tdhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica High Yield Bond I
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- uslix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- usblx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- beqax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
American Century Equity Growth Fund A Class
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- fskgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Fidelity® Growth Strategies K6 Fund
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jhme
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Energy
John Hancock Multifactor Energy ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »
- jhfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
John Hancock Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- umbmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ihayx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hartford Multi-Asset Income and Growth Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hgirx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Hartford Core Equity Fund Class R3
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sasmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- sbbax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
QS Conservative Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- dmusx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Delaware Tax-Free USA Intermediate Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jscsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
JPMorgan U.S. Small Company Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- aofax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Alger Small Cap Focus Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- apdmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Artisan Mid Cap Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tscsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- adfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
American Century Diversified Bond Fund A Class
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »