Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$CIGCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,394 International Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- uge
- ETF
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
- uustx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
USAA Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund Shares
Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- vfpix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Private Capital Management Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vwmix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Virtus Horizon Wealth Masters Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- wflvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- wfstx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Wells Fargo Specialized Technology Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- wftdx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Wells Fargo Specialized Technology Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- wtltx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- yassx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »