Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$CIGCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,394 International Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- rdclx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Limited Duration Credit Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wfgbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- lmbjx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BrandywineGLOBAL - Dynamic US Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mgvcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
MainStay MacKay Infrastructure Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- pthix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BNY Mellon High Yield Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- qed
- ETF
- Alternatives
- Neutral
IQ Hedge Event-Driven Tracker ETF
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »
- rudax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sbayx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- sdd
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »