Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$CIGCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,394 International Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- bccpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BlackRock 20/80 Target Allocation Fund Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- iteq
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- dali
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
First Trust Dorsey Wright DALI 1 ETF
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bis
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- gtadx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Goldman Sachs Target Date 2025 Portfolio A Shares
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- knpyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Kinetics Paradigm Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- iivlx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lfecx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- lttcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »