Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$CHY Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,461 Other Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- shmmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tcilx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tclcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tdtf
- ETF
- Bond
- Government Bond
FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- trrvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
T. Rowe Price Target 2025 Fund
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- usstx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
USAA Tax Exempt Short-Term Fund
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vgwix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Vanguard Global Wellesley Income Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- warax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Absolute Return Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- alfax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »