Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$CHKCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hgoax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
The Hartford Growth Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- legax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hvoyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Hartford Quality Value Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- wemix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jgyax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fhaux
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2025 Fund
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- lvhb
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Innovator Lunt Low Vol/High Beta Tactical ETF
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- prefx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
T. Rowe Price Tax-Efficient Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ragix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income Class A
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- emryx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
VanEck Emerging Markets Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- aionx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
AQR International Momentum Style Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- shssx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- aqgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AQR Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mggpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tnaax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- sfgix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Seafarer Overseas Growth and Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- udn
- ETF
- Money Market
- World
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »
- trmvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Value Fund Class F
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »