CHIR : Global X MSCI China Real Estate ETF

CHIR is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIR

Global X MSCI China Real Estate ETF

FI Score

38 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIR vs HFHRX

25% FI Score
  • hfhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs LMSCX

25% FI Score
  • lmscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Municipal Bond Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs TPLNX

25% FI Score
  • tplnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Timothy Plan Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs EPGIX

25% FI Score
  • epgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

EuroPac Gold Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs ESGEX

25% FI Score
  • esgex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Reynders McVeigh Core Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs PGSAX

25% FI Score
  • pgsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs GTAJX

25% FI Score
  • gtajx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2030 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs LVAFX

25% FI Score
  • lvafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs ESVIX

25% FI Score
  • esvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs ETEGX

25% FI Score
  • etegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs FUSGX

25% FI Score
  • fusgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Fund for U.S. Government Securities Class A shares

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs ETNDX

25% FI Score
  • etndx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund Class N Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs EURL

25% FI Score
  • eurl
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs LTUCX

25% FI Score
  • ltucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs FADVX

25% FI Score
  • fadvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Frost Value Equity Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs LEND

25% FI Score
  • lend
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Amplify CrowdBureau(R) Peer-to-Peer Lending & Crowdfunding ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs ASGTX

25% FI Score
  • asgtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Transamerica Small Cap Growth A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs SHTCX

25% FI Score
  • shtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs AMGAX

25% FI Score
  • amgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs FHICX

25% FI Score
  • fhicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated High-Income Bond Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo