Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$CHIK Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- anbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
American Funds Strategic Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- augcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Columbia Quality Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- ncrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- ndmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ngcrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Conservative Class C
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- nlacx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Nuveen Large Cap Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- nlscx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- nnlex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Nicholas Limited Edition Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- arsox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aristotle/Saul Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »