CHIK : Global X MSCI China Information Technology ETF

CHIK is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIK

Global X MSCI China Information Technology ETF

FI Score

36 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIK vs OAACX

42% FI Score
  • oaacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Inveso Active Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs SPICX

42% FI Score
  • spicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco S&P 500 Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs AWSAX

42% FI Score
  • awsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs AYMAX

42% FI Score
  • aymax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

American Century High Yield Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs AZTFX

42% FI Score
  • aztfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aquila Tax-Free Trust of Arizona Class A

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs OSICX

42% FI Score
  • osicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs BAL

42% FI Score
  • bal
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Cotton Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs OUSM

42% FI Score
  • ousm
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs PACAX

42% FI Score
  • pacax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs BCBDX

42% FI Score
  • bcbdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo