CHIK : Global X MSCI China Information Technology ETF

CHIK is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIK

Global X MSCI China Information Technology ETF

FI Score

36 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIK vs FWSHX

18% FI Score
  • fwshx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

First Western Short Duration High Yield Credit Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs TNACX

18% FI Score
  • tnacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs GNXAX

18% FI Score
  • gnxax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs GMMCX

18% FI Score
  • gmmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Dynamic Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs HSFNX

18% FI Score
  • hsfnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Hennessy Small Cap Financial Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs RMICX

18% FI Score
  • rmicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

RiverFront Asset Allocation Moderate Class C

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs RYBOX

18% FI Score
  • rybox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Rydex Biotechnology Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs RYOAX

18% FI Score
  • ryoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Rydex Biotechnology Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs HNRZX

18% FI Score
  • hnrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Highland Opportunistic Credit Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs USERX

18% FI Score
  • userx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

U.S. Global Investors Gold and Precious Metals Fund

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs RYAHX

18% FI Score
  • ryahx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs TMNAX

18% FI Score
  • tmnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs VRECX

18% FI Score
  • vrecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class CX

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs UIPIX

18% FI Score
  • uipix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort Mid-Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs RYRLX

18% FI Score
  • ryrlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs ULE

18% FI Score
  • ule
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Ultra Euro

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs HCMKX

18% FI Score
  • hcmkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

HCM Income Plus Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs XMPT

18% FI Score
  • xmpt
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

VanEck Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs TEFQX

18% FI Score
  • tefqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs RYPMX

18% FI Score
  • rypmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Rydex Precious Metals Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo