Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$CHIK Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- rltsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class Investor II
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tibcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pblcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Principal Blue Chip Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- peizx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
PGIM Jennison Value Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pdszx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rypnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Royce Opportunity Fund Investment Class
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pgeox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
George Putnam Balanced Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ehstx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- eimdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipal Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »