Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$CHIH Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- psmc
- ETF
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Invesco Conservative Multi-Asset Allocation ETF
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mtiix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Global Equity
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Infrastructure Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »
- aryix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
American Century Investments One Choice 2035 Portfolio Investor Class
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- ecasx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- htd
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund
Expenses: 2.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mndax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
MFS New Discovery Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- otccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jclmx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- psdbx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund Class B
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- flqm
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- osgcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ocmix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Invesco Select Risk: Moderate Investor Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- asmnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- smlcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fkbsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Federated Kaufmann Small Cap Fund Class B Shares
Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mcnkx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund Investor C1 Shares
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mcagx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- bamgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Sterling Capital Strategic Allocation Balanced Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »