Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$CHICX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- nsbtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Trust Class
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pmzcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Mortgage Opportunities and Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mxfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jemdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- agivx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gifpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- laaax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Macro Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- kcny
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
KraneShares E Fund China Commercial Paper ETF
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ihfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Integrity High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »