CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs NHINX

47% FI Score
  • nhinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ABASX

47% FI Score
  • abasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

AB Discovery Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ABDAX

47% FI Score
  • abdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Columbia Capital Allocation Conservative Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ACFOX

47% FI Score
  • acfox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NUMG

47% FI Score
  • numg
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NSIUX

47% FI Score
  • nsiux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Northern Short-Intermediate U.S. Government Fund

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NWQAX

47% FI Score
  • nwqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Nuveen NWQ Flexible Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs OHYAX

47% FI Score
  • ohyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MCA

47% FI Score
  • mca
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc.

Expenses: 2.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs AFB

47% FI Score
  • afb
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund

Expenses: 2.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs AFDAX

47% FI Score
  • afdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

American Century Sustainable Equity Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PFGRX

47% FI Score
  • pfgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PFIAX

47% FI Score
  • pfiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Low Duration Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ALARX

47% FI Score
  • alarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ALNYX

47% FI Score
  • alnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund New York Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs AMZA

47% FI Score
  • amza
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

InfraCap MLP ETF

Expenses: 2.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NAWGX

47% FI Score
  • nawgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NBMTX

47% FI Score
  • nbmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NEARX

47% FI Score
  • nearx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ARBNX

47% FI Score
  • arbnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo