CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs RORE

47% FI Score
  • rore
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Hartford Multifactor REIT ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs EIFGX

47% FI Score
  • eifgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs EIDIX

47% FI Score
  • eidix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs RYPFX

47% FI Score
  • rypfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Royce Pennsylvania Mutual Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs RYSEX

47% FI Score
  • rysex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Royce Special Equity Fund Investment Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PEGEX

47% FI Score
  • pegex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth Fund- Class R2

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs LIT

47% FI Score
  • lit
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs EOD

47% FI Score
  • eod
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ERH

47% FI Score
  • erh
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PFUNX

47% FI Score
  • pfunx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class I-3

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PGOFX

47% FI Score
  • pgofx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Pioneer Select Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs RYURX

47% FI Score
  • ryurx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse S&P 500® Strategy Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs EVSTC

47% FI Score
  • evstc
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Eaton Vance Stock NextShares

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs EXCRX

47% FI Score
  • excrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Manning & Napier Core Bond Series Class S

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MLABX

47% FI Score
  • mlabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs EXTGX

47% FI Score
  • extgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Growth 1.2 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FACCX

47% FI Score
  • faccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SEMMX

47% FI Score
  • semmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Semper MBS Total Return Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SENYX

47% FI Score
  • senyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

SEI Tax Exempt Trust New York Municipal Bond Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SKTAX

47% FI Score
  • sktax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

SEI Asset Allocation Trust Core Market Strategy Allocation Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo