CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs PLICX

49% FI Score
  • plicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PMYAX

49% FI Score
  • pmyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NCLEX

49% FI Score
  • nclex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Nicholas Limited Edition Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PSRAX

49% FI Score
  • psrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Pioneer Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs RTM

49% FI Score
  • rtm
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs XSHQ

49% FI Score
  • xshq
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SGRAX

49% FI Score
  • sgrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Wells Fargo Growth Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SPECX

49% FI Score
  • specx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Alger Spectra Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SPXV

49% FI Score
  • spxv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

ProShares S&P 500 ex-Health Care ETF

Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs TBLIX

49% FI Score
  • tblix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs YAFIX

49% FI Score
  • yafix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

AMG Yacktman Focused Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs USEQ

49% FI Score
  • useq
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Invesco Russell 1000 Enhanced Equal Weight ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs VKLMX

49% FI Score
  • vklmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Intermediate Term Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs VRAI

49% FI Score
  • vrai
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Virtus Real Asset Income ETF

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs VMINX

49% FI Score
  • vminx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Municipal Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs RZG

49% FI Score
  • rzg
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PRRZX

49% FI Score
  • prrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PSCU

49% FI Score
  • pscu
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs RYF

49% FI Score
  • ryf
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SCGVX

49% FI Score
  • scgvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Sands Capital Global Growth Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo