CHI : Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund

CHI is a Other Market Other with HIGH fees.

CHI

Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund

FI Score

46 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,461 Other Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHI vs HWVAX

39% FI Score
  • hwvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Diversified Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs MSIAX

39% FI Score
  • msiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Advantage Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs MSIOX

39% FI Score
  • msiox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs VVPSX

39% FI Score
  • vvpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs ASIAX

39% FI Score
  • asiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs PCTBX

39% FI Score
  • pctbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam California Tax Exempt Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs PCDAX

39% FI Score
  • pcdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PIMCO California Short Duration Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs BSJR

39% FI Score
  • bsjr
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs PPVCX

39% FI Score
  • ppvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Funds Preservation Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs WBIGX

39% FI Score
  • wbigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

William Blair International Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs HTUS

39% FI Score
  • htus
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Hull Tactical US ETF

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs CNCR

39% FI Score
  • cncr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs PCPCX

39% FI Score
  • pcpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs SWMIX

39% FI Score
  • swmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Laudus International MarketMasters Fund™

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs GYLD

39% FI Score
  • gyld
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs MIISX

39% FI Score
  • miisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

BNY Mellon Income Stock Fund Investor shares

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs POEYX

39% FI Score
  • poeyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Principal Origin Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs MMDAX

39% FI Score
  • mmdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Madison Moderate Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs IOFCX

39% FI Score
  • iofcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs SVIIX

39% FI Score
  • sviix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo