Diversification Rating
5 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$CHGX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- subfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pzt
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- reml
- ETF
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
Credit Suisse X-Links Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
- shdax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Western Asset Short Duration Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sidnx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- slvp
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Basic Materials
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- susc
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares ESG USD Corporate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tbt
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- trffx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
T. Rowe Price Target 2055 Fund
Expenses: 0.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »