Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$CGBCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ecimx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hiifx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emdcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund-Class C
Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rbnax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fyaix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Access Flex High Yield Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cchyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- scbsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Short-Term Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aubcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco World Bond Factor Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sibpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »