Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$CFRCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ryhhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Rydex High Yield Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hldcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwstx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund Class M
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- embax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iadex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Diversified Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nhsax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Short Duration High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aif
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Apollo Tactical Income Fund Inc.
Expenses: 4.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- chyax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
CMG Tactical Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »