Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$CFRAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pghyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer Global High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dnfrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fehax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Eagle High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mcwix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BlackRock Strategic Global Bond Fund, Inc. Investor C1 Shares
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fcfbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- psfrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Newfleet Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- agmix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AllianzGI Emerging Markets SRI Debt Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ekhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dblnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DoubleLine Income Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »