Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$CDHAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- poeax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- prrox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Putnam RetirementReady 2025 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- mclox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund, Inc. Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pliax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Pacific Funds Core Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- tunix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Unconstrained Bond Class I
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sbstx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Short-Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ryprx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Royce Premier Fund Investment Class
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- stdfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- vgfo
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus WMC Global Factor Opportunities ETF
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »