Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$CAXAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hgxcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Impact Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tlvox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Thrivent Low Volatility Equity Fund Class S
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rgsax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AllianzGI Global Small-Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- baegx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BMO Global Low Volatility Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lstix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Strategic Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gesox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Equity Select Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ralox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Real Assets and Pricing Opportunities Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ggeax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nationwide Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- apgrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Yorktown Growth Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »