CATH : Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF

CATH is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with LOW fees.

CATH

Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF

FI Score

68 /100

Diversification Rating

8 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

7 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Similar Funds

We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CATH vs EVSTC

47% FI Score
  • evstc
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Eaton Vance Stock NextShares

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs SDVGX

47% FI Score
  • sdvgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sit Dividend Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs LEVOX

47% FI Score
  • levox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Lazard US Equity Concentrated Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs ONRDX

46% FI Score
  • onrdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Rising Dividends Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs HCACX

46% FI Score
  • hcacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

The Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs AFNAX

46% FI Score
  • afnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs GABIX

46% FI Score
  • gabix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Gabelli Asset Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs SEEKX

46% FI Score
  • seekx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Crossmark Steward Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs AMCA

46% FI Score
  • amca
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

iShares Russell 1000 Pure U.S. Revenue ETF

Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs CSXCX

46% FI Score
  • csxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Calvert US Large Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs NYVBX

46% FI Score
  • nyvbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Davis New York Venture Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs NBSTX

46% FI Score
  • nbstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs CHGX

46% FI Score
  • chgx
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs WIL

46% FI Score
  • wil
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Barclays Women in Leadership ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs QIACX

46% FI Score
  • qiacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Federated MDT All Cap Core Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs DRTHX

46% FI Score
  • drthx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs PTOAX

46% FI Score
  • ptoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

PIMCO StocksPLUS® Absolute Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs MLVAX

45% FI Score
  • mlvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs NRAAX

45% FI Score
  • nraax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs USGIX

45% FI Score
  • usgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

USAA Growth & Income Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo