CATH : Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF

CATH is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with LOW fees.

CATH

Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF

FI Score

68 /100

Diversification Rating

8 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

7 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CATH vs BXICX

15% FI Score
  • bxicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Global Credit Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs CADAX

15% FI Score
  • cadax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Cavalier Adaptive Income Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs CANGX

15% FI Score
  • cangx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

CAN SLIM Select Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs BCEDX

15% FI Score
  • bcedx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock Emerging Markets Flexible Dynamic Bond Portfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs PGJAX

15% FI Score
  • pgjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs LPVIX

15% FI Score
  • lpvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2055 Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs LWEAX

15% FI Score
  • lweax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs LZGOX

15% FI Score
  • lzgox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard Global Fixed Income Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs DDFCX

15% FI Score
  • ddfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Delaware Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs LPHCX

15% FI Score
  • lphcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2045 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs GSYAX

15% FI Score
  • gsyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs Imprint Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs NMINX

15% FI Score
  • nminx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Maryland Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs HLDAX

15% FI Score
  • hldax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs ICEEX

15% FI Score
  • iceex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

ICON Energy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs ACCOX

15% FI Score
  • accox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century International Value Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs IDVGX

15% FI Score
  • idvgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Copeland International Risk Managed Dividend Growth Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs MFHVX

15% FI Score
  • mfhvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Mesirow Financial High Yield Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs MPYEX

15% FI Score
  • mpyex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Meritage Yield-Focus Equity Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs MSFEX

15% FI Score
  • msfex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Frontier Markets Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CATH vs NVXIX

15% FI Score
  • nvxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

Navigator Sentry Managed Volatility Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo