• oargx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Oakmark Global Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• foolx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

MFAM Global Opportunities Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• ivwcx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

IVA Worldwide Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• amtax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

AB All Market Real Return Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• imrfx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Columbia Global Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• awacx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy Class C

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• jri
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund

Expenses: 2.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• qgrnx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• cgo
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Calamos Global Total Return Fund

Expenses: 3.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• chw
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund

Expenses: 3.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• jogix
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

JOHCM Global Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• maegx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

BlackRock Long-Horizon Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• esgyx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• dex
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Delaware Enhanced Global Dividend & Income

Expenses: 3.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• rapix
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc Class I

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• bpglx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

UBS Global Allocation Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• hgxtx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Hartford Global Impact Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• mvgax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• wrldx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Scharf Global Opportunity Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• rsggx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Victory RS Global Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »