Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$CACMX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- affix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Yorktown Multi-Asset Income Fund Class L
Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cvy
- ETF
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fdiv
- ETF
- Allocation
- All-In-One
First Trust Strategic Income ETF
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- wfgbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mgxbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Growth Allocation Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- qibgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Federated MDT Balanced Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- astax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- abpax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AB Conservative Wealth Strategy Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- bcgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Sterling Capital Diversified Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »