Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$CACMX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- wbalx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Weitz Balanced Fund - Investor Class
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- nvgbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pcef
- ETF
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- araax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Horizon Active Risk Assist® Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pvsbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Capital Spectrum Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pvscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Capital Spectrum Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- occix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Invesco Select Risk: Conservative Investor Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- capbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Federated Capital Income Fund Class B Shares
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mgdcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Moderate Growth Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »