Diversification Rating
4 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$CACG Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,019 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- eemo
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- pladx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds Short Duration Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eittx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Parametric TABS 10-to-20 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pdczx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Income Builder Fund-Class Z
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- eos
- Mutual Fund
- Other
- Options-based
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »
- epi
- ETF
- International Stocks
- India Stock
WisdomTree India Earnings Fund
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- esgf
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global ESG Revenue ETF
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- esgw
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Sustainable Global Equity Income ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hgxvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Impact Fund Class R6
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »