Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$CACFX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- lphax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2045 Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- lstox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Strategic Equity Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jsvix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
James Alpha Structured Credit Value Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- asdax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
AAM/HIMCO Short Duration Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- gwsax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Gabelli Focus Five Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- heqfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Monteagle Opportunity Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lcdax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ecsmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- glblx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Leuthold Global Fund Class Retail
Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »