Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$CACFX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tflax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cfrix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Floating Rate Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cgbax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
City National Rochdale Government Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dcfgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tgryx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Real Estate
TCW Global Real Estate Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
- pufcx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Financial Services
PGIM Jennison Financial Services Fund- Class C
Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »
- cpqix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Counterpoint Long-Short Equity Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- dnhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- raalx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Conductor Global Equity Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »