Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$BXTCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hyxu
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares International High Yield Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dsiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Diamond Hill Corporate Credit Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fiifx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Intermediate Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dheax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Diamond Hill Short Duration Total Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ptlcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hysax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gudb
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Sage ESG Intermediate Credit ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eagmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jahyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Janus Henderson High-Yield Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »