Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$BXGAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tboax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Templeton International Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hyfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Harbor High-Yield Bond Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pyfrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Payden Floating Rate Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mhbnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BMO High Yield Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dibax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BNY Mellon International Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rphyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund Class Retail
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- labcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aibdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Century International Bond Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- masax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay Unconstrained Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »